catbear's Journal

> recent entries
> calendar
> friends
> Gallery
> profile
> previous 20 entries

Advertisement

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010
9:59 am - A Tailor Made Prince - Headshots


Click on image for gallery.

Cast and crew headshots for the Kitchener-Waterloo Little Theatre production of A Tailor Made Prince, by Robert Card, directed by Robert Card. All images copyright Sean M Puckett / KWLT. For reuse, click here.

(1 comment | comment on this)

Saturday, January 30th, 2010
5:30 pm - Pandora's Box exhibition at KW|AG
Highly recommended.



My photos of the reception are work safe (unless you zoom in).

The exhibition is challenging in good ways. Not only does the artwork challenge gender roles, but the space itself created by the exhibit is a "freedom to talk about sexuality and gender" zone that is even more important. You should go.

(comment on this)

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010
6:58 pm - iPad Thoughts
If you don't like it, then you just don't understand and should go back to your cave and play with your Eniac some more.

The iPad is designed to be the computer for people who don't want a god damn computer. It's a tool that is non-threatening and simple enough for people who can operate a microwave oven but still have flashing 12:00 on the VCR. Thus: if I had a grandma, I would buy it for her and throw her PC in the garbage.

I call it the console computer, because it is going to do for general computing what video game consoles did for games. And frankly I think this is the point at which Microsoft starts to shit its pants, because no one who who just wants to Get Shit Done needs to buy windows anymore. Just get an iPad and a keyboard dock and buy a few apps. And you are done. No viruses, no moving parts, no compatibility problems. No "where do I click" just "yay, that works."

It's a simple hammer for a world that for the most part just needs a simple hammer, and the the only thing that's been on the market for the past 40 years have been SUPER PNEUMATIC UBER NAILGUN MONSTROSITIES with hoses and 220V power requirements and special nails that if you load incorrectly will just kill you dead.

Yay for hammers.

Now if only Rogers doesn't FUCK US again.
Oh, yeah, that's what they do.

(comment on this)

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
7:03 pm - Look an art photo


From late last year. Image # DI27

(1 comment | comment on this)

Thursday, January 21st, 2010
9:50 pm - Mousetrap Headshots

I have been way too busy! Here's what I did last night --

Gallery: headshots for KWLT production of "The Mousetrap"



(comment on this)

Friday, January 1st, 2010
9:21 am - Interesting Times

I reflected this morning that for as lazy as I am, I don't seem to take the easy road.  I think this speaks to human nature in general.   Each of us balances a need for stimulation with a desire to be content*.  Many times in my life I've had choices to either continue contentedly with a reasonable situation, or to take a risk with something new and exciting.  Usually I choose the risk***. 

Which has brought me to 2010 with a number of resources that could be sold/whored to others for lots of cash -- or held and explored by myself to see what interesting things may come from them.

I wonder if I'm getting to old to be an explorer, a risk-taker; but the truth is that the urge can never leave, and if I tried to kill it, I'd kill my self.

Anyway, happy new year.

--
* This is why the television, RSS feeds and online social** networking are so generally destructive to the human potential.  One can be contentedly stimulated for hours and at the end of it have accomplished precisely nothing. 

** They aren't truly social because they don't have all of the components of real social interaction.  The main and most important components they miss are physical presence, and natural pauses.  Why these are important will have to be another post, probably by another poster.

*** Like any successful adaptable life form, there's a genetic call to seek out unexplored niches for the possibility of [metaphorical] riches. 

(comment on this)

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009
11:56 am - Avatar
We saw Avatar yesterday, on the 3D system* at Galaxy Waterloo.

I've just got two points to talk about.

One: Avatar is a roller coaster ride. No one criticizes a roller coaster for going exactly where you can see it going. The fun is the in the visceral experience you get while riding. And Avatar delivers that visceral experience like no movie has before. We are taken to a completely new, unique environment and allowed to wallow in it for 150 minutes with a predictable but well crafted script to tie the scenes and scenery together. Seriously: the Aerosmith Rock 'n Rollercoaster ride lasts all of 82 seconds of "HOLY CRAP." Avatar lasts much, much longer. And although it doesn't accelerate at 4.5Gs, Avatar does put you, visually, in an amazing variety of astonishingly realistic but nevertheless entirely fabricated scenes and situations, and the HOLY CRAP moments come rather frequently, along with many, many moments of not quite so holy proportions. Do you see what I'm saying? It's not the Met, it's Cedar Point.

Two: if you're going to see it, and you should, go see it in 3D, in a theatre. IMAX if you can. I can't see any point in watching it in 2D, and we won't buy the DVD, because there's no damn point. The story is forgettable just as any roller coaster is when you describe it later (it went up! it went down! it went around and around!); and while the visuals are very pretty in 2D, the thing -- the THING OF THIS THING-- is the visceral experience of seeing it on a big screen in 3D.

So go spend your twelve bucks or whatever.

--
* Polarized glasses using the RealD system. Brightness suffered badly. You'd think with Christie Digital being a local vendor there would be some kind of push to get the best projectors installed at the theatre. But, no. The screen was, basically, wan. And suffered for it.

(8 comments | comment on this)

Saturday, December 5th, 2009
4:13 pm - Nine Shutters and a Fire Bell
Nine Shutters and a Fire Bell




Image # DH03

(1 comment | comment on this)

4:11 pm - Ivy on White Wall
Ivy on White Wall



Image # DI28

(2 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009
9:35 am - Aladdin photo shoot technical recap
Monday night I shot the dress rehearsal of a local theatre group's performance of Aladdin (a pantomime). 

A preview image (click for gallery):

Princess Martini and her retinue react to the return of Abanaza (out of frame).  Visible L to R: Nadia Hayford, Selina Saba, Adam Cyr, Marijana Vorkapic

Princess Martini and her retinue react to the return of Abanaza (out of frame).
Visible L to R: Nadia Hayford, Selina Saba, Adam Cyr, Marijana Vorkapic
Photo: Sean M Puckett / KWLT

Technical photoshoot details!

>> On-Set

Lighting:
House lighting, tungsten, minimal gels, generally full power.  Lots of light (usually).  No strobes.

Camera: Nikon D90.  D200 on stand-by.  Fresh battery in the D90 to start, 33% remaining at end after 3 hours of very heavy shooting.  However, very little LCD and no flash use, so there wasn't much for the battery to do except focus and take pictures.

Lenses:  Nikkor 85/1.4, 50/1.8, 10.5mm fish, 18-200 superzoom.  About 70% of the final shots were taken with the zoom.  I used the zoom with image stabilization, and generally in the 18-85 range.  I'll probably get one of the 2.8 constant aperture zooms in this range soon, as it would be nice to have a little more subject isolation and light sensitivity.  Still, the 18-200 has always formed the core of my theatrical work because I must react to staging quickly.  (None of these shots are posed or replayed.)

Memory card: 16GB class 6 ADATA SDHC.  3400 shots filled up 75% of it.  I had extra cards, of course.

File Format: JPG.  Why JPG?  I would have preferred to shoot RAW, but my software, the aging Bibble 4, doesn't support the D90's RAW files.  And Bibble gives me the look I want, even with JPG. 

Setting up for JPG: JPG is much less forgiving of white balance and exposure problems, so before the rehearsal, I dropped a grey card and did a colour balance at the typical light levels for the production.  The D90, like most Nikon dSLRs (even the expensive ones), has a nasty habit of overexposing significantly in contrasty situations.  And an overexposed JPG is a lost cause.  To combat this, I set an overall matrix exposure compensation of -1.6EV.  I also had the JPG engine set for neutral contrast, minimal sharpening, and AdobeRGB colourspace to record as much perceptually relevant image data as possible.  I don't use Active D-Lighting because it does "local contrast enhancement", creating halos around high contrast dark/light borders. 

Aside: JPG in Post: In general they were fine.  I had no highlight blowouts in keeper shots.  Some moderate contrast frames were a bit dark, but I pulled them up without much degradation.  (I shoot photographs, not pixels.)  I consider JPG in this situation to be a success.

Shooting: Aperture Priority, Auto ISO.  ISO was set to 200 with Auto ISO on.  I set the Auto ISO shutter speed barrier to 1/30 and the maximum ISO to 3200.  (This means the camera will keep the shutter speed at or above 1/30 if possible.)  Apertures were generally from 2.8 to 5.6.  The cave scenes were very dark, however, and the camera had to struggle to keep up -- even at ISO 3200 I was getting shutter speeds of 1/8 and slower (thus the blur, which I don't mind anyway).

Autofocus: Single, centre.  I find the D90's autofocus to be fast and accurate even in very challenging situations; much better than the D200.  I always shoot in single point AF mode, generally with the centre point active (focus/recompose).  I will move the point around occasionally for bang-bang reaction shots on faces.  I have the AE/AF lock button set to be the autofocus trigger, and the focus mode set to AF-C so the camera will take a shot when I push the shutter whether it is in focus or not.

>> Post Processing

Culling software: I used ACDSee Pro 2.5 for primary, secondary and tertiary culling.  Because it is fast as hell.  First pass rejected 1300 technically flawed shots.  Second pass identified 800 three stars.  Third pass gave me 150 four stars, at which point I began actual processing.

An aside: Why so many shots?  I often take multiple shots of a single "event" in rapid-fire.  This lets me choose among varying expressions, poses, and framing choices.  Typically the selection happens in the third pass.  Since exposures are cheap (aside from time spent culling them), I find it better to have more choices rather than have to make do.

Post software: Bibble 4, with plug-ins.  There were two treatments; "outside" and "cave". 

Outside treatment: to emphasise the playful, cartoony nature of the production, I chose a very high contrast, vibrant and saturated look.  Yellows, blues and purples were super saturated to enhance the storybook/royalty aspect.  Shadow tones were pushed slightly purple to give a royal velvet feel.  Reds were shifted somewhat to magenta to differentiate them from yellows.  Skin tones were nailed down to only slightly saturation levels to stay out of the orange zone.

Cave treatment: Contrast reduced, maximum light levels reduced, colours warmed, purples saturated even more, shadows turned bluish.  And every frame had the horizon adjusted left or right about 10% to give an "askew" look.  (Yes, I grew up with Batman IN COLOR why do you ask?)

Fisheye: Most of the fisheye shots were defished partially to reduce the fisheye distortion and "unwrap" the wide angles.  I didn't flatten them completely as that tends to distort figures at the edge of the frame too much. 

Vignetting: I use a vignette of varying shapes (narrow/circular/wide) in every shot to draw the eye and soften edges. 

I'll be happy to answer any questions.

(2 comments | comment on this)

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009
4:03 pm - Aladdin
KWLT's production of Aladdin (a pantomime) premieres tomorrow night. Locals should seriously consider going to see this live theatre production. It's great fun, the script is horribly punny and the cast is wonderful.

To inspire you to go, here is actor Jonathan Dietrich in drag:



Many more pictures from Monday's dress rehearsal on my gallery site.

Show info here.

(1 comment | comment on this)

Monday, November 30th, 2009
12:50 pm - two things
Okay, time for those announcements.

I have been selected by the city of Kitchener as their artist in residence for 2011. My application for the program was for a project called "A Portrait of Kitchener". Essentially, I'll create portraits of over a thousand residents of the city. These portraits will be used for the city during its centennial celebration in 2012.

Typically, the city doesn't choose artists in residence two years in advance, but according to the chair of the arts and culture committee, the selection group could not decide between my proposal and that of a landscape photographer. They decided to do it this way so they would "lock me in" for 2011 so they would have the portraits in hand for 2012. It's not a bad gig to be paid (there is a decent honorarium) to have your work appear in a city's centennial celebration. There will also be a book.

I'll provide more details about the project as it firms up.

I also, just last week, volunteered to be the "photographer-in-residence" for our local orchestra, the Kitchener Waterloo Symphony. Although things have yet to be fully arranged with formal notifications of personnel, the goal is for me to have open access to the orchestra through many events and rehearsals, to create a visual record of the musicians, the work, and the music.

As many things do, this started with a casual remark to a friend, in this case Edwin Outwater, the youthful music director of the Symphony, who we've shared a beer with but not much more due to his extremely busy schedule. That led to an introduction to the Symphony's marketing director, which led to a meeting, where everybody got excited. And are still excited!

I'll share photos when they come.

I've got more stuff to say, but it will have to go in another post, because I have to go to the post office and drop off grant proposals -- fun projects that will involve some local actors if they are approved. And that I have to come back here and work on my letter of nomination for a local arts group's Board of Directors. And photograph some paintings. And do some planning for a couple series' that have been rising on the sideboard for awhile.

So I'm a little busy...

(11 comments | comment on this)

Monday, November 9th, 2009
5:34 pm - Shed Door



"Shed Door"

Image # DI26 View "textures" gallery.

(1 comment | comment on this)

Thursday, October 29th, 2009
7:48 pm - Autumn Lines



"Autumn Lines"

Image # DI04 View in Gallery.

I'd complained about the high tension wires stretching across this, but refuse to edit them out. They're part of the scene, and add an interesting compositional accent.

(comment on this)

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009
11:57 am - Where is it? Waterloo --- final round -- contest

I've finished a series of 24 urban architecture shots.  They're all strong B&W shots focusing on texture and shapes.  Each one of them was shot somewhere in Uptown Waterloo (or the vicinity).  Many of them incorporate prominent features of uptown businesses or familiar landmarks, but using non-traditional framing.  Yes, they're kind of artsy.  I like them.   

Here's another "public" image from the gallery.

Sean Puckett > Image # DI07

Now, on to the contest.  From the people who most correctly identify the location of each photo before I post the next one, I'll chose one person at random who will receive two free signed 8x10 prints of any photos in the series they wish.

Results from Round 7
Here's the previous contest image:

Sean Puckett > Image # DI15

Where is it: Waterloo North Hydro building, 17 William St E.. 
This shot was taken while standing on the corner at Regina and William Street.
Street View

There was just one correct response, and that winner has been notified.

Round 8 Image -- Where is it? -- Ultimate Final  Showdown

Sean Puckett > Image # DI10

Yes, this is in Uptown Waterloo!  But where? 

How to enter the contest:

1) Reply to this post.  Anonymous replies are okay -- you don't have to be an LJ member to participate.  Replies are screened; no one but myself can see them.

2) In your reply, include your name and your email address.  Unless you object, your email address will be added to my photography event mailing list, which has very light traffic -- my show and class announcements only -- and will not be shared with anyone else. 

3) Give me the street address or closest intersection of the location shown.  Provide any additional specific information that might be needed to absolutely identify what is being seen (e.g. "The roof of the Button Factory").  If your answer is not particularly specific, I'll choose a more specific answer from someone else as more correct.  Don't be lazy, this isn't a timed quiz. You have at least two days to go uptown to check -- print out the image and double-check.

4) If your entry is the selected winner, I'll email you and ask for your mailing address so I can send you the prints.  Or you can just come by my studio to pick them up.  Give me a couple of weeks to make all the prints at once after the contest is over -- it's easier that way, and you'll be able to choose from the whole set.

This is the last image in the contest, and it's a doozy.  
Please share the link to my journal to other locals who might wish to participate!
And be sure to have a look at my photography website, seanmpuckett.com

.

(comment on this)

Friday, October 9th, 2009
4:42 pm - Where is it? Waterloo --- round seven redux

So, I'm really tardy with updating the Where is it? Waterloo contest. I wanted to give everyone one last chance to enter round seven. Actually, now that Google Maps has Street View for uptown Waterloo, the contest is much easier than it was.

As a reminder, here is the round seven image:

Sean Puckett > Image # DI15

If you can figure out where this is in uptown Waterloo*, and are interested in winning two original photographic prints, click here to go back to the previous journal post with all the entry information: http://catbear.livejournal.com/559607.html

---
* Uptown Waterloo, in this context, basically means within, or very near to the Waterloo city core.

(3 comments | comment on this)

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009
6:45 pm - Where is my damned future?

I am sick and tired of typing.  I am sick and tired of mice.  I am sick and tired of these old-fashioned, pathetic interface methods.  I'm tired of wrist pain.  I'm tired of sitting at a desk all day.  I have a far different computer interface paradigm in my head, and it's very difficult for me to wait for it to be implemented.  I suppose it all comes from watching too many sci-fi movies.  Be that as it may however, having the course of our future technologies laid before us through the writings of sci-fi visionaries is fairly traditional.

I want a 50 inch diagonal multi-touch screen.  I want a programming interface that eliminates the reliance on strings of arcane text, instead allowing you to build nested modules of functionality that interconnects like a child's electronics kit.  I want to be able to touch, drag, link, and associate functionality with gestures.  I want to use my voice to instantiate and modify.  I want programming to be dynamic and visual*

I can see how all this feels in my head.  I can almost envision the underlying architecture that would make it work.  And I stare at this computer, with its 50 year old programming paradigms, and look at my wrists, aching, and sigh.

Where is my damned future?

--
* MAX-MSP and Quartz Composer are similar in concept, but my vision encompasses the encapsulation of procedural/functional units in an event driven ecosystem, rather than a strictly packet-based, time linear system.

(5 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009
2:11 pm - Where is it? Waterloo -- round 7 -- contest
I've finished a series of 24 urban architecture shots.  They're all strong B&W shots focusing on texture and shapes.  Each one of them was shot somewhere in Uptown Waterloo (or the vicinity).  Many of them incorporate prominent features of uptown businesses or familiar landmarks, but using non-traditional framing.  Yes, they're kind of artsy.  I like them.   

Here's another "public" image from the gallery.

Sean Puckett > Image # DI14

Now, on to the contest.  There are 19 images out of the 24 visible online as of this writing.  Every couple of days, including today, I'll unveil one of the previously hidden images.  From the people who most correctly identify the location of each photo before I post the next one, I'll chose one person at random who will receive two free signed 8x10 prints of any photos in the series they wish.

Results from Round 6
Here's the previous contest image:

Sean Puckett > Image # DI02

Where is it: The Waterloo Hotel, 2 King N, Waterloo.  Specifically, the upper portion of the King St facade. 

There were two correct answers given -- congratulations to each of you -- and the winner has been notified!

The following image, also in the series but not part of the contest, was taken a few moments later:

Sean Puckett > Image # DI04



Round 7 Image -- Where is it?

Sean Puckett > Image # DI15

Yes, this is in Uptown Waterloo!  But where? 

How to enter the contest:

1) Reply to this post.  Anonymous replies are okay -- you don't have to be an LJ member to participate.  Replies are screened; no one but myself can see them.

2) In your reply, include your name and your email address.  Unless you object, your email address will be added to my photography event mailing list, which has very light traffic -- my show and class announcements only -- and will not be shared with anyone else. 

3) Give me the street address or closest intersection of the location shown.  Provide any additional specific information that might be needed to absolutely identify what is being seen (e.g. "The roof of the Button Factory").  If your answer is not particularly specific, I'll choose a more specific answer from someone else as more correct.  Don't be lazy, this isn't a timed quiz. You have at least two days to go uptown to check -- print out the image and double-check.

4) If your entry is the selected winner, I'll email you and ask for your mailing address so I can send you the prints.  Or you can just come by my studio to pick them up.  Give me a couple of weeks to make all the prints at once after the contest is over -- it's easier that way, and you'll be able to choose from the whole set.

Some of the images are pretty easy.  Some will be very difficult. 
Please share the link to my journal to other locals who might wish to participate!
And be sure to have a look at my photography website, seanmpuckett.com

(comment on this)

Monday, September 28th, 2009
3:42 pm - KPL Exhibition (documentation)
Here's a visual record of the recent exhibition of my photography at Kitchener Public Library.



... 48 more photos behind the cut, including direct links to my online gallery for each piece exhibited ... )

(1 comment | comment on this)

Friday, September 25th, 2009
5:43 pm - Where is it? Waterloo - round 6 - contest
I've finished a series of 24 urban architecture shots.  They're all strong B&W shots focusing on texture and shapes.  Each one of them was shot somewhere in Uptown Waterloo (or the vicinity).  Many of them incorporate prominent features of uptown businesses or familiar landmarks, but using non-traditional framing.  Yes, they're kind of artsy.  I like them.   

Here's another "public" image from the gallery.

Sean Puckett > Image # DI13

Now, on to the contest.  There are 18 images out of the 24 visible online as of this writing.  Every couple of days, including today, I'll unveil one of the previously hidden images.  From the people who most correctly identify the location of each photo before I post the next one, I'll chose one person at random who will receive two free signed 8x10 prints of any photos in the series they wish.

Results from Round 5
Here's the previous contest image:

Sean Puckett > Image # DI17

Where is it: The Starlight Social Club, 47 King, Waterloo.  Specifically, a portion of the signage on the King Street facade.

There were three correct answers given -- congratulations to each of you.  I wasn't sure how tricky this one would be, but thought for sure that we'd have at least one correct guess!  Only one winner, though, and through the random atmospheric noise recorded by microphones at random.org, this person has been chosen!

Round 6 Image -- Where is it?

Sean Puckett > Image # DI02

Yes, this is in Uptown Waterloo!  But where? 

How to enter the contest:

1) Reply to this post.  Anonymous replies are okay -- you don't have to be an LJ member to participate.  Replies are screened; no one but myself can see them.

2) In your reply, include your name and your email address.  Unless you object, your email address will be added to my photography event mailing list, which has very light traffic -- my show and class announcements only -- and will not be shared with anyone else. 

3) Give me the street address or closest intersection of the location shown.  Provide any additional specific information that might be needed to absolutely identify what is being seen (e.g. "The roof of the Button Factory").  If your answer is not particularly specific, I'll choose a more specific answer from someone else as more correct.  Don't be lazy, this isn't a timed quiz. You have at least two days to go uptown to check -- print out the image and double-check.

4) If your entry is the selected winner, I'll email you and ask for your mailing address so I can send you the prints.  Or you can just come by my studio to pick them up.  Give me a couple of weeks to make all the prints at once after the contest is over -- it's easier that way, and you'll be able to choose from the whole set.

Some of the images are pretty easy.  Some will be very difficult. 
Please share the link to my journal to other locals who might wish to participate!
And be sure to have a look at my photography website, seanmpuckett.com

--> Originally posted with comments visible; that's been fixed. The answer that was posted at the time wasn't right, so nothing's been given away!

(comment on this)


> previous 20 entries
> top of page
LiveJournal.com